Programmatically moving variation to product as parent has error

Don't miss out Virtual Happy Hour this Friday (April 26).

Try our conversational search powered by Generative AI!

AI OnAI Off

Home / Forums / Developers (Main Products) Forum / Customized Commerce 13 and earlier versions /

Programmatically moving variation to product as parent has error "Parent of a node must be another node or a catalog."

Matthew Boniface

Vote:

I've got some logic that sometimes has to move a variation to beneath a product, I have code that looks like this:

contentRepository.Move(variation.ContentLink, product.ContentLink, AccessLevel.NoAccess, AccessLevel.NoAccess);

Unfortunately it throws this error whenever it does this:

System.InvalidOperationException: Parent of a node must be another node or a catalog.
 at EPiServer.Commerce.Catalog.Provider.Internal.CatalogContentMoveHandler.GetNewParent(ContentReference newParentLink, Int32& newParentNodeId, Int32& newCatalogId)
 at EPiServer.Commerce.Catalog.Provider.Internal.CatalogContentMoveHandler.SetParentNodeForEntry(ContentReference contentLink, ContentReference newParentLink)
 at EPiServer.Commerce.Catalog.Provider.Internal.CatalogContentMoveHandler.MoveWithTransaction(Action`2 moveMethod, ContentReference contentLink, ContentReference newParentLink)
 at EPiServer.Core.Internal.DefaultContentRepository.Move(ContentReference contentLink, ContentReference destinationLink, AccessLevel requiredSourceAccess, AccessLevel requiredDestinationAccess)
 at FOO.BAR.Web.Features.Products.Import.ProductImportJob.ImportProducts(ImportProductsRootModel productsRootModel, ErpSystem erpSystem, ContentReference productsCatalogLink) in C:\Dev\FOOBAR\src\FOO.BAR.Web\Fea
tures\Products\Import\ProductImportJob.cs:line 539

From digging around, it seems there might be a bug in the CatalogContentMoveHandler.. It seems to have two separate methods for handling the move of a entry vs node, but then both of those methods use the same GetNewParent private method which has a switch statement for the destination content type to only be CatalogNode or Catalog, otherwise throws the above error..

Is there a bug, or am I using this wrong?

We're on Commerce v11.8.5 (latest v11.x version)

#198611

Nov 01, 2018 6:37

Quan Mai

Vote:

You can't move a variant to a product. If you want to assign a variant to a product, you would have to use IRelationRepository to save a new ProductVariation relation

            var relation = new ProductVariation();
            relation.Parent = Product.ContentLink;
            relation.Child = Variant.ContentLink;
            _relationRepository.UpdateRelation(relation);

#198617

Nov 01, 2018 9:03

Matthew Boniface

Vote:

Hi Quan

Hmm, it seems contrary to creating a new variation which you can have the product as its parent:

var newVariation = contentRepository.GetDefault<MyVariation>(productLink);

And also in the UI, it seems to support this also:

Oh and additionally the context menu to create a new variation under the product is offered too:

Are you sure it shouldn't be possible to move a variant to under a product?

#198873

Nov 08, 2018 7:21

Quan Mai

Vote:

Good question. But the UI does not have to reflect the API 100%. It is used to make sure the life for editors as easy and as productive as possible. As a developer you should understand the underlying implementation and go with it.

#198874

Nov 08, 2018 7:30

Matthew Boniface

Vote:

Hi Quan, sure but the creation content API does allow putting a variation under a product.. And from noseying around the catalog content provider's move logic, I think it might just be a simple bug - looks like they prepared it to handle move of entries versus nodes differently but then just applied the same check anyway.. Feels like a mistake to me.

#198875

Edited, Nov 08, 2018 7:32

Quan Mai

Vote:

The API example you showed just set the ParentLink to the product. It will not work if you call GetChildren on the product or GetAncestors on the variants. I would say that is the inconsistency but sometimes we don't bother to check those conditions

#198876

Nov 08, 2018 7:39

Matthew Boniface

Vote:

I'll take your wisdom over mine :) But definitely wasn't intuitive behavior for the move logic for me.

#198877

Nov 08, 2018 7:41

Quan Mai

Vote:

I realized we can make it a little better by having a better exception message, "Parent of a node must be another node or a catalog." is not exactly correct in this case :)

#198883

Nov 08, 2018 8:36

This topic was created over six months ago and has been resolved. If you have a similar question, please create a new topic and refer to this one.