K Khan
Sep 15, 2015
(5 votes)

EPiServer Find performance review

EPiServer Find is a product for free text search as well as content retrieval. It offers an intuitive API for indexing and querying objects. It allows to query data using our own domain model as it recognizes the fact that we know best about our data. It offers a better experience to users, shorter development cycles and cost efficiency.

EPiserver Find Search performance and capabilities are proven but how developers are using those can affect the site performance. If developers are writing queries that involves round trips can effect the performance of page.

//Not optimal
foreach (var article in Articles)
      var results = SearchClient.Instance.Search<ArticlePage>()
results = service.MultiSearch<ArticlePage>()
                            .Search<Article>(x => x.For("Article1").InField(y => y.Title))
                            .Search<Article>(x => x.For("Article2").InField(y => y.Title))

Indexing data to EPiserver find is a time consuming task and needs consideration when implementing. We need to consider batch size and objects also. EPiserver Find indexing like Bulks.

// Not optimal 
List<MyObject> objects = GetObjectsFromSomeWhere();
foreach (var o in objects)
// Optimal 
List<MyObject> objects = GetObjectsFromSomeWhere();

By doing this, we will significantly reduce the number of calls sent to the Find index, thus increase the general performance and decrease time taken to index. 

While indexing we have to consider object sizes also. If object size are too large we have to reduce the no of items to go in one index pack. There are few other factors that developers must consider while indexing the data are as following

  • Dont Index the unwanted objects e.g. Images/Videos
    ContentIndexer.Instance.Conventions.ForInstancesOf<ImageData>().ShouldIndex(x => false);
  • Implement the BatchSize for indexing so it can be adjusted to improve indexing time.
    // set the ContentBatchSize to confingured value 
    ContentIndexer.Instance.ContentBatchSize = contentBatchSize;
    // set the MediaBatchSize to confingured value
    ContentIndexer.Instance.MediaBatchSize = mediaBatchSize;

It will be helpful, if you could share performance issue that you have faced and their fixes also in comments. 

Sep 15, 2015


Henrik Fransas
Henrik Fransas Sep 15, 2015 12:29 PM

Great post!

Also remenber to cache the the result if you are using GetResult (GetContentResult do it automaticly) like this:

var result = client.Search()

And also a great way to improve performance is to use projections instead of returning the whole object, if you for example only are interested in title and author name you can do like this to project it into a anonymous type:

var result = client.Search()
    .Select(x => new { 
        AuthorName = x.Author.Name })

Or like this to project it into a type'ed object:

var result = client.Search()
    .Select(x => new SearchResult { 
        Title = x.Title.AsCropped(50), 
        Author = x.Author.Name})

K Khan
K Khan Sep 15, 2015 02:47 PM

great addition :)

Per Magne Skuseth
Per Magne Skuseth Sep 25, 2015 09:14 AM

Thanks for sharing!
Regarding bulk indexing, check out this blog post for a handy snippet

Please login to comment.
Latest blogs
AI-Assistant: The 'Change Tone' Shortcut

The AI-Assistant for Optimizely is constantly evolving, adjusting, and transforming to meet your digital needs, providing a cutting-edge advantage...

Luc Gosso (MVP) | Sep 27, 2023 | Syndicated blog

How to fix scheduled job 'Remove Abandoned BLOBs' if it keeps failing

Optimizely inlcudes a job named 'Remove Abandoned BLOBs'. This post will help you fix it if it's no longer working.

Henning Sjørbotten | Sep 26, 2023 | Syndicated blog

Optimizely Web Experimentation Metrics

Within the domain of Optimizely Web Experimentation Metrics, the emphasis is on objective key performance indicators (KPIs) selected to assess an...

Matthew Dunn | Sep 23, 2023 | Syndicated blog

Optimizely For you Intranet

Having been at Optimizely and in the CMS industry for nearly 16 years I have seen clients’ intranet requirements go from a simple site just to hous...

Robert Folan | Sep 22, 2023