K Khan
Sep 15, 2015
(5 votes)

EPiServer Find performance review

EPiServer Find is a product for free text search as well as content retrieval. It offers an intuitive API for indexing and querying objects. It allows to query data using our own domain model as it recognizes the fact that we know best about our data. It offers a better experience to users, shorter development cycles and cost efficiency.

EPiserver Find Search performance and capabilities are proven but how developers are using those can affect the site performance. If developers are writing queries that involves round trips can effect the performance of page.

//Not optimal
foreach (var article in Articles)
      var results = SearchClient.Instance.Search<ArticlePage>()
results = service.MultiSearch<ArticlePage>()
                            .Search<Article>(x => x.For("Article1").InField(y => y.Title))
                            .Search<Article>(x => x.For("Article2").InField(y => y.Title))

Indexing data to EPiserver find is a time consuming task and needs consideration when implementing. We need to consider batch size and objects also. EPiserver Find indexing like Bulks.

// Not optimal 
List<MyObject> objects = GetObjectsFromSomeWhere();
foreach (var o in objects)
// Optimal 
List<MyObject> objects = GetObjectsFromSomeWhere();

By doing this, we will significantly reduce the number of calls sent to the Find index, thus increase the general performance and decrease time taken to index. 

While indexing we have to consider object sizes also. If object size are too large we have to reduce the no of items to go in one index pack. There are few other factors that developers must consider while indexing the data are as following

  • Dont Index the unwanted objects e.g. Images/Videos
    ContentIndexer.Instance.Conventions.ForInstancesOf<ImageData>().ShouldIndex(x => false);
  • Implement the BatchSize for indexing so it can be adjusted to improve indexing time.
    // set the ContentBatchSize to confingured value 
    ContentIndexer.Instance.ContentBatchSize = contentBatchSize;
    // set the MediaBatchSize to confingured value
    ContentIndexer.Instance.MediaBatchSize = mediaBatchSize;

It will be helpful, if you could share performance issue that you have faced and their fixes also in comments. 

Sep 15, 2015


Henrik Fransas
Henrik Fransas Sep 15, 2015 12:29 PM

Great post!

Also remenber to cache the the result if you are using GetResult (GetContentResult do it automaticly) like this:

var result = client.Search()

And also a great way to improve performance is to use projections instead of returning the whole object, if you for example only are interested in title and author name you can do like this to project it into a anonymous type:

var result = client.Search()
    .Select(x => new { 
        AuthorName = x.Author.Name })

Or like this to project it into a type'ed object:

var result = client.Search()
    .Select(x => new SearchResult { 
        Title = x.Title.AsCropped(50), 
        Author = x.Author.Name})

K Khan
K Khan Sep 15, 2015 02:47 PM

great addition :)

Per Magne Skuseth
Per Magne Skuseth Sep 25, 2015 09:14 AM

Thanks for sharing!
Regarding bulk indexing, check out this blog post for a handy snippet

Please login to comment.
Latest blogs
Optimizely SendGrid SMTP host is deprecated

SendGrid is a services for sending email that is included in Optimizely DXP. Previously smtp.episerver.net was the recommended SMTP server to use,...

Tomas Hensrud Gulla | Dec 4, 2022 | Syndicated blog

Hosting Optimizely CMS 12 on Docker Engine

Since Optimizely CMS can now be deployed as a Docker container, here is a demonstration of building, running and scaling an Optimizely CMS 12 site ...

Stefan Holm Olsen | Dec 4, 2022 | Syndicated blog

How to use CacheTagHelper with content areas in Optimizely CMS 12

I might be going out on a limb here - if you have a better solution, feel very free to share it!  Upgrading your Optimizely web application from .N...

Andreas J | Dec 2, 2022

The 1001st Piece in your 1000 Piece Puzzle: .NET Default Interface Functions

I was recently working with a client who wanted a reasonably large subsystem added to Optimizely that would add automated management to their...

Greg J | Nov 28, 2022 | Syndicated blog