Mark Stott
OMVPworkspace_premiumSaaS CMS Administrator Certification +3
Nov 19, 2021
visibility 4749
star star star star star star
(5 votes)

Adding Secure Headers in Optimizely CMS 12

I have previously blogged about this in a pure .NET 5.0 context on my own blog here: Secure Headers in .NET 5.0. In this version of this post I have adapted the solution to work with an Optimizely CMS Build.

I have been building .NET 5.0 websites for personal projects as well as reviewing the move from .NET 4.8 to .NET 5.0 by Optimizely and seeing the evolution of the CMS solution.  In any website build it is best practice to remove any headers that your website may produce which expose the underlying technology stack and version.  This is known as information leakage and provides malicious actors with information that allows them to understand the security flaws in the hosting technologies utilized by your website.  It is also best practice to provide headers which instruct the user's browser as to how your website can use third parties and be used by third parties in order to offer the best protection for the user.

.NET 5.0 and .NET Core 3.1 follow a common pattern in how you build websites.  Web.config is meant to be a thing of the past with configuration of the site moving to appsettings.json and code.  A good place to add security headers to your requests is to create a security header middleware. However the routing of the CMS content does not pass through this middleware so I've fallen back to Action Attributes:

namespace MyProject.Features.Security
{
    using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Filters;

    public class SecurityHeaderActionAttribute : ActionFilterAttribute
    {
        public override void OnResultExecuting(ResultExecutingContext context)
        {
            base.OnResultExecuting(context);

            context.HttpContext.Response.Headers.Add("X-Frame-Options", "SAMEORIGIN");
            context.HttpContext.Response.Headers.Add("X-Xss-Protection", "1; mode=block");
            context.HttpContext.Response.Headers.Add("X-Content-Type-Options", "nosniff");
            context.HttpContext.Response.Headers.Add("Referrer-Policy", "no-referrer");

            context.HttpContext.Response.Headers.Add("Content-Security-Policy", "default-src 'self'; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https://cdn.jsdelivr.net; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https://cdn.jsdelivr.net; img-src 'self' data: https:; frame-src 'self' https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/;");
        }
    }
}

I did find that I couldn't remove the server and x-powered-by headers using this method.  As it turns out, these are added by the hosting technology, in this case IIS.  The only way to remove these headers was to add a minimal web.config file to the web solution that contained just enough configuration to remove these headers.

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<configuration>
   <system.webServer>
       <httpProtocol>
           <customHeaders>
               <remove name="X-Powered-By" />
           </customHeaders>
       </httpProtocol>
       <security>
           <requestFiltering removeServerHeader="true" />
       </security>
   </system.webServer>
</configuration>

I spent a good while looking for this solution, almost every solution I could find was based on hosting within Kestrel rather than IIS.  If you are hosting with Kestrel, then you can remove the server header by updating your CreateHostBuilder method in program.cs to set the options for Kestrel to exclude the server header.

public static IHostBuilder CreateHostBuilder(string[] args, bool isDevelopment)
{
   return Host.CreateDefaultBuilder(args)
              .ConfigureCmsDefaults()
              .ConfigureWebHostDefaults(webBuilder =>
              {
                  webBuilder.UseStartup<Startup>();
                  webBuilder.UseKestrel(options => { options.AddServerHeader = false; });
              });
}
Nov 19, 2021

Comments

error Please login to comment.
Latest blogs
Computed Fields in CMS 13 Content Contracts with Optimizely Graph

Content Contracts in Optimizely CMS 13 allow different content types to share a common structure when querying Optimizely Graph. But what if the...

Mardy | Oct 14, 2026

Opal Workflow Agents And The Graph Webhook Trap

What we did? We built a compliance review workflow agent in Opal. The job was simple: when an editor submits a page for review in Optimizely CMS 13...

Ritu Madan | Oct 14, 2026

cms13-scan: A Deterministic CMS 13 Readiness Scanner

Every CMS 12 to CMS 13 upgrade I have looked at starts the same way. Someone opens the solution and starts hunting. A text search for the APIs

Adnan Zameer | Oct 12, 2026 |

Setting Up an Optimizely CMS 13 MCP Server Locally with Codex

Optimizely CMS 13 supports Model Context Protocol (MCP) , allowing AI tools such as Claude and Codex to interact with CMS content and metadata...

Mardy | Oct 12, 2026