Mark Stott
+2
Nov 19, 2021
visibility 4619
star star star star star star
(5 votes)

Adding Secure Headers in Optimizely CMS 12

I have previously blogged about this in a pure .NET 5.0 context on my own blog here: Secure Headers in .NET 5.0. In this version of this post I have adapted the solution to work with an Optimizely CMS Build.

I have been building .NET 5.0 websites for personal projects as well as reviewing the move from .NET 4.8 to .NET 5.0 by Optimizely and seeing the evolution of the CMS solution.  In any website build it is best practice to remove any headers that your website may produce which expose the underlying technology stack and version.  This is known as information leakage and provides malicious actors with information that allows them to understand the security flaws in the hosting technologies utilized by your website.  It is also best practice to provide headers which instruct the user's browser as to how your website can use third parties and be used by third parties in order to offer the best protection for the user.

.NET 5.0 and .NET Core 3.1 follow a common pattern in how you build websites.  Web.config is meant to be a thing of the past with configuration of the site moving to appsettings.json and code.  A good place to add security headers to your requests is to create a security header middleware. However the routing of the CMS content does not pass through this middleware so I've fallen back to Action Attributes:

namespace MyProject.Features.Security
{
    using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Filters;

    public class SecurityHeaderActionAttribute : ActionFilterAttribute
    {
        public override void OnResultExecuting(ResultExecutingContext context)
        {
            base.OnResultExecuting(context);

            context.HttpContext.Response.Headers.Add("X-Frame-Options", "SAMEORIGIN");
            context.HttpContext.Response.Headers.Add("X-Xss-Protection", "1; mode=block");
            context.HttpContext.Response.Headers.Add("X-Content-Type-Options", "nosniff");
            context.HttpContext.Response.Headers.Add("Referrer-Policy", "no-referrer");

            context.HttpContext.Response.Headers.Add("Content-Security-Policy", "default-src 'self'; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https://cdn.jsdelivr.net; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https://cdn.jsdelivr.net; img-src 'self' data: https:; frame-src 'self' https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/;");
        }
    }
}

I did find that I couldn't remove the server and x-powered-by headers using this method.  As it turns out, these are added by the hosting technology, in this case IIS.  The only way to remove these headers was to add a minimal web.config file to the web solution that contained just enough configuration to remove these headers.

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<configuration>
   <system.webServer>
       <httpProtocol>
           <customHeaders>
               <remove name="X-Powered-By" />
           </customHeaders>
       </httpProtocol>
       <security>
           <requestFiltering removeServerHeader="true" />
       </security>
   </system.webServer>
</configuration>

I spent a good while looking for this solution, almost every solution I could find was based on hosting within Kestrel rather than IIS.  If you are hosting with Kestrel, then you can remove the server header by updating your CreateHostBuilder method in program.cs to set the options for Kestrel to exclude the server header.

public static IHostBuilder CreateHostBuilder(string[] args, bool isDevelopment)
{
   return Host.CreateDefaultBuilder(args)
              .ConfigureCmsDefaults()
              .ConfigureWebHostDefaults(webBuilder =>
              {
                  webBuilder.UseStartup<Startup>();
                  webBuilder.UseKestrel(options => { options.AddServerHeader = false; });
              });
}
Nov 19, 2021

Comments

error Please login to comment.
Latest blogs
Copies vs. Connections: Modeling Content Areas for Multilingual Success

Starting With the Simple Question Most multilingual content modeling conversations start with a deceptively simple question from a client: "If we s...

Vipin Banka | Aug 23, 2026

Content Transfer coming to Optimizely SaaS CMS

Back in June I released Content Transfer on the Optimizely nuget feed – today I’m releasing version 1.0 , because we’ve had it running out in the...

Matt Pallatt | Aug 23, 2026

Improving Optimizely Product Information in LLM Tools

Tools like Claude Code can be great for working with Optimizely CMS, but when they index outdated or incomplete information about developing a...

Nicholas Sideras | Aug 21, 2026 |

How to Get a Bacpac Out of DXP (And Never Do It By Hand Again)

Every Optimizely DXP project eventually runs into the same task: getting production data onto a local machine so you can actually troubleshoot...

KennyG | Aug 20, 2026