Mark Stott
Nov 19, 2021
  3985
(5 votes)

Adding Secure Headers in Optimizely CMS 12

I have previously blogged about this in a pure .NET 5.0 context on my own blog here: Secure Headers in .NET 5.0. In this version of this post I have adapted the solution to work with an Optimizely CMS Build.

I have been building .NET 5.0 websites for personal projects as well as reviewing the move from .NET 4.8 to .NET 5.0 by Optimizely and seeing the evolution of the CMS solution.  In any website build it is best practice to remove any headers that your website may produce which expose the underlying technology stack and version.  This is known as information leakage and provides malicious actors with information that allows them to understand the security flaws in the hosting technologies utilized by your website.  It is also best practice to provide headers which instruct the user's browser as to how your website can use third parties and be used by third parties in order to offer the best protection for the user.

.NET 5.0 and .NET Core 3.1 follow a common pattern in how you build websites.  Web.config is meant to be a thing of the past with configuration of the site moving to appsettings.json and code.  A good place to add security headers to your requests is to create a security header middleware. However the routing of the CMS content does not pass through this middleware so I've fallen back to Action Attributes:

namespace MyProject.Features.Security
{
    using Microsoft.AspNetCore.Mvc.Filters;

    public class SecurityHeaderActionAttribute : ActionFilterAttribute
    {
        public override void OnResultExecuting(ResultExecutingContext context)
        {
            base.OnResultExecuting(context);

            context.HttpContext.Response.Headers.Add("X-Frame-Options", "SAMEORIGIN");
            context.HttpContext.Response.Headers.Add("X-Xss-Protection", "1; mode=block");
            context.HttpContext.Response.Headers.Add("X-Content-Type-Options", "nosniff");
            context.HttpContext.Response.Headers.Add("Referrer-Policy", "no-referrer");

            context.HttpContext.Response.Headers.Add("Content-Security-Policy", "default-src 'self'; style-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https://cdn.jsdelivr.net; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline' https://cdn.jsdelivr.net; img-src 'self' data: https:; frame-src 'self' https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/;");
        }
    }
}

I did find that I couldn't remove the server and x-powered-by headers using this method.  As it turns out, these are added by the hosting technology, in this case IIS.  The only way to remove these headers was to add a minimal web.config file to the web solution that contained just enough configuration to remove these headers.

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<configuration>
   <system.webServer>
       <httpProtocol>
           <customHeaders>
               <remove name="X-Powered-By" />
           </customHeaders>
       </httpProtocol>
       <security>
           <requestFiltering removeServerHeader="true" />
       </security>
   </system.webServer>
</configuration>

I spent a good while looking for this solution, almost every solution I could find was based on hosting within Kestrel rather than IIS.  If you are hosting with Kestrel, then you can remove the server header by updating your CreateHostBuilder method in program.cs to set the options for Kestrel to exclude the server header.

public static IHostBuilder CreateHostBuilder(string[] args, bool isDevelopment)
{
   return Host.CreateDefaultBuilder(args)
              .ConfigureCmsDefaults()
              .ConfigureWebHostDefaults(webBuilder =>
              {
                  webBuilder.UseStartup<Startup>();
                  webBuilder.UseKestrel(options => { options.AddServerHeader = false; });
              });
}
Nov 19, 2021

Comments

Please login to comment.
Latest blogs
Understanding Optimizely Opal Cost

Opal pricing are transparent at large extent, It is based on a credit consumption model rather than fixed per-user licensing or tokens consumptions...

K Khan | May 25, 2026

Optimizely CMS 12 Now Fully Supports .NET 10

This is the latest installment in our ongoing series covering .NET version support for Optimizely products. If you've been following along, you may...

Bien Nguyen | May 25, 2026

Optimizely Opal: How to Build Effective Workflow Agents

If you're building workflow agents in Optimizely Opal, this post covers how specialized agents pass context to each other, why keeping agents small...

Andre | May 20, 2026

ReviewPR: An Azure Function That Reviews Your Azure DevOps Pull Requests With Claude

A while back I wrote about an  Azure Function App for PDF creation that we use to offload PDF rendering from our Optimizely DXP site. That same...

KennyG | May 19, 2026