K Khan
Aug 18, 2016
  3291
(4 votes)

page validations

There are instances when Editors should to be informed in form of warning and information rather to stop them and display error messages. For self note IValidate interface can be used for this purpose. e.g

public class StandardPageValidator : IValidate<StandardPage>
    {
        public IEnumerable<ValidationError> Validate(StandardPage instance)
        {
            if (instance.Name.Length < 10)
            {
                return new List<ValidationError>() {
                    new ValidationError() {
                        ErrorMessage ="Name is very short",
                        PropertyName = "Name",
                        Severity =ValidationErrorSeverity.Info,
                        ValidationType =ValidationErrorType.AttributeMatched
                    }
                };
            }

            return Enumerable.Empty< ValidationError>();
        }
    }

Image information.jpg

References:

http://world.episerver.com/documentation/Class-library/?documentId=episerverframework/7.5/e53f458f-f4a1-2904-620d-cad9167f3387

http://world.episerver.com/documentation/Class-library/?documentId=episerverframework/7.5/2a269a53-76ff-8c86-5984-5512fbe9f9b9

Aug 18, 2016

Comments

Aug 19, 2016 05:35 PM

Good post.  One additional thing I would mention here is that you can compare multiple fields as part of your validation logic, which gives the interface a bit more flexibility than other methods.

K Khan
K Khan Aug 19, 2016 07:07 PM

Good point Janaka, Thanks for sharing!

David Strøm
David Strøm Aug 24, 2016 11:15 AM

I have begun using this kind of validation for required properties instead of the builltin functionality which shows the editor a very anonymous form with the required fields. In my opinion the editor can easily loose track of context when they see this form.

Instead I use the IValidate to handle required fields and other validations. Exactly as you describe it. Then the editor has the context of the whole content type.

Good of you to put some spotlight on the IValidate functionality.

K Khan
K Khan Aug 24, 2016 11:24 AM

Thanks for sharing your approach, That makes sense!

Per Nergård (MVP)
Per Nergård (MVP) Aug 24, 2016 09:59 PM

We use this all the time and as David said it's perfect for validate several fields if you whish.  You can actually manipulate the data in the properties. Unfortunately the changes made in a validation isn'r reflected in the UI so the editor can see. I played around with it and you can read a blog post about it here.

K Khan
K Khan Aug 25, 2016 09:52 AM

Here we go! Thanks Per :), I remeber this now, You post is really a good reference point on this topic.

Please login to comment.
Latest blogs
Announcing new library: SettingsManager

When you run .net app, there have been a few ways to store settings. Those can be set via appSettings.json, or via Azure Portal AppService...

Quan Mai | Apr 30, 2026

From Prompting to Production: Optimizely Opal University Cohort and the Future of Agentic MarTech

Most organizations today are still playing with AI. They experiment with prompts, test ideas in isolated chats, and occasionally automate a task or...

Augusto Davalos | Apr 28, 2026

Six Compelling Reasons for Upgrading to CMS 13

Most software updates ask you to keep up. Optimizely CMS 13 asks something different — it asks whether your digital strategy is built for a world...

Muhammad Talha | Apr 28, 2026

Optimizely CMS 13 breaking changes: GetContentTypePropertyDisplayName

When upgrading from CMS 12 to 13, resolving property display names may not work as before. Here’s what changed.

Tomas Hensrud Gulla | Apr 27, 2026 |