Jul 30, 2010
visibility 7732
star star star star star
(0 votes)

Why you have to mark your properties as virtual when using PTB

A colleague asked me why all the properties that are to be mapped with PageTypeBuilder has to be virtual. This is sort of interesting and everyone that’s using PTB might not be aware of the reason so I thought that that merits a quick post about it.

 

Interceptors

PTB uses something called Interceptors which are used to (wait for it) intercept calls. The framework PTB uses for this is called DynamicProxy and is part of the Castle fame. The reason the properties have to be virtual is that the DynamicProxy needs to override (in the case of PTB) your properties to be able to run the code you (or Joel in this case) specify in the interception.

Why intercept?

A standard property using PTB looks something like this

   1: [PageTypeProperty(Type = typeof(PropertyString))]
   2: public virtual string Heading { get; set; }

and yet when calling CurrentPage.Heading it automagically has the value of the property CurrentPage[“Heading”]. This is due to the interception of the property Heading. Since the logic of how to handle the getting and setting of properties is the same for all properties you can use the above code instead of what’s actually happening under the covers which is something like this

   1: public virtual string Heading
   2: {
   3:     get
   4:     {
   5:         return this["Heading"] as string;
   6:     }
   7:     set
   8:     {
   9:         this.SetValue("Heading", value);
  10:     }
  11: }

So PTB uses interception both to be able to infer which property you’re getting/setting as well as handle the actually getting/setting which stays the same for all properties.

 

How the magic happens

PTB first does some wiring so that the interception is activated for the TypedPageData (see the class TypedPageActivator). Since we’re only interested in intercepting those properties we talked about above PTB uses a generation hook for this

   1: public bool ShouldInterceptMethod(Type type, MethodInfo memberInfo)
   2: {
   3:     return (memberInfo.IsGetterOrSetterForPropertyWithAttribute(typeof(PageTypePropertyAttribute)) && memberInfo.IsCompilerGenerated());
   4: }

So when you access one of the properties the generated proxy intercepts the call. The actual getting and setting of values is handled by the Intercept method in the class PageTypePropertyInterceptor.

   1: public void Intercept(IInvocation invocation)
   2: {
   3:     TypedPageData invocationTarget = (TypedPageData) invocation.InvocationTarget;
   4:     string propertyName = invocation.Method.GetPropertyName();
   5:     if (invocation.Method.IsGetter())
   6:     {
   7:         invocation.ReturnValue = invocationTarget[propertyName];
   8:         if ((invocation.ReturnValue == null) && (invocation.Method.ReturnType == typeof(bool)))
   9:         {
  10:             invocation.ReturnValue = false;
  11:         }
  12:     }
  13:     else
  14:     {
  15:         invocationTarget.SetValue(propertyName, invocation.Arguments[0]);
  16:     }
  17: }

As you can see on line 4 it uses the name of the property to avoid having magic string. It then basically does what the code above that explicitly handled the getting and setting does so that you won’t have to.

Jul 30, 2010

Comments

error Please login to comment.
Latest blogs
Composition Over Inheritance: Why Your Content Contract Is Not a Base Class

Inside the structural conformance pattern in SaaS CMS — from server-side inheritance to pipeline governance. A contract in Optimizely SaaS CMS is...

Vipin Banka | Sep 19, 2026

Optimizely Opti ID Integration: Why the API Key Was Missing from the DXP Management Portal

While working on an Optimizely CMS 12 Opti ID integration recently, we ran into an issue that initially appeared to be related to SSO authenticatio...

Madhu | Sep 18, 2026 |

Extending a Contract: What You Can Override

Contracts share fields across content types — but not every field setting can be overridden. Push the same contract onto several components, and CM...

Chirag Khanna | Sep 18, 2026 |

Building a Blazor Server UI Inside the Optimizely CMS 13 Admin Shell

What I learned shipping a Blazor Server UI inside Optimizely CMS 13 — Razor components in a NuGet package, the Blazor hub next to MapContent(),...

Stanisław Szołkowski | Sep 17, 2026 |