John-Philip Johansson
Jun 13, 2017
visibility 6887
star star star star star star
(12 votes)

Introducing Group/Role support in Content Approvals

This feature was released in CMS UI 10.10.0.

What are Groups/Roles?

Groups, or Roles, are already commonly used in the CMS to manage access rights and other settings that should apply to a group of users instead of setting them individually. A commonly mentioned use case for Content Approvals is to add a group of users to a step instead of individual users. For example, adding the "Legal Department" group as a reviewer. This makes setting up content approval sequences easier as well as allowing the members of a group to change without having to change the sequence. So if there's a new hire in the "Legal Department" or someone leaves for another position, you just have to update the group and the new hire is included in the reviews (both ongoing and future reviews) and the removed user can no longer review content.

 Image blog-role-reviewer.gif

What about Notifications in large groups?

Adding a very large group will result in notifications being sent out to all the current members of the group on every step in a content approval sequence. This can have negative effects on the performance of the server, as well as probably annoy users. Therefore, we have added a new configuration setting, "ApprovalStepRoleUserLimit", that defaults to 100 users per group. Adding a group larger than this setting to a content approval sequence, triggers a validation warning, and it also limits the amount of notifications per group.

What are known limitations?

There can be limitations depending on the role provider used. See the SDK for more information.

Jun 13, 2017

Comments

error Please login to comment.
Latest blogs
Composition Over Inheritance: Why Your Content Contract Is Not a Base Class

Inside the structural conformance pattern in SaaS CMS — from server-side inheritance to pipeline governance. A contract in Optimizely SaaS CMS is...

Vipin Banka | Sep 19, 2026

Optimizely Opti ID Integration: Why the API Key Was Missing from the DXP Management Portal

While working on an Optimizely CMS 12 Opti ID integration recently, we ran into an issue that initially appeared to be related to SSO authenticatio...

Madhu | Sep 18, 2026 |

Extending a Contract: What You Can Override

Contracts share fields across content types — but not every field setting can be overridden. Push the same contract onto several components, and CM...

Chirag Khanna | Sep 18, 2026 |

Building a Blazor Server UI Inside the Optimizely CMS 13 Admin Shell

What I learned shipping a Blazor Server UI inside Optimizely CMS 13 — Razor components in a NuGet package, the Blazor hub next to MapContent(),...

Stanisław Szołkowski | Sep 17, 2026 |