Architecting AI in Optimizely CMS: When to Use Opal vs Custom Integration
AI is rapidly becoming a core capability in modern digital experience platforms. As developers working with Optimizely CMS 12 (.NET Core), the real question is no longer:
“Can we integrate AI?”
But rather:
“What is the right architectural approach for AI inside Optimizely?”
In this article, I’ll share practical implementation patterns, lessons learned, and how to decide between custom AI integration and leveraging Opal.
Why AI Integration Matters in CMS Implementations
Across multiple implementations, I’ve observed recurring challenges:
-
Manual metadata tagging
-
Inconsistent summaries and SEO descriptions
-
Static personalization logic
-
Slow campaign iteration cycles
-
Limited experimentation insights
AI, when architected correctly, can significantly enhance these areas - without disrupting core CMS performance.
Option 1: Custom AI Integration in Optimizely CMS 12
For organizations requiring flexibility and control, integrating external AI services (e.g., Azure OpenAI or private ML models) remains a powerful option.
Recommended Architecture
Editor → CMS → AI Service Layer → External AI Provider
Step 1: Introduce an Abstraction Layer
public interface IAIContentService
{
Task<string> GenerateSummaryAsync(string content);
Task<List<string>> GenerateTagsAsync(string content);
}
This ensures your CMS remains provider-agnostic.
Step 2: Register via Dependency Injection
services.AddHttpClient<IAIContentService, AIContentService>();
Keep AI logic outside controllers and content models. Treat it as infrastructure.
Step 3: Hook into CMS Events
Example: Auto-tag content during publishing.
_contentEvents.PublishingContent += async (sender, args) =>
{
if (args.Content is ArticlePage page)
{
var tags = await _aiService.GenerateTagsAsync(page.MainBody.ToHtmlString());
page.Tags = tags;
}
};
Important Considerations
Performance
-
Never execute AI calls during page rendering.
-
Use background jobs or publish-time triggers.
-
Cache generated outputs.
Security
-
Store API keys in secure vaults.
-
Avoid exposing AI endpoints client-side.
Prompt Governance
Treat prompts like code:
-
Version them
-
Document them
-
Test them
Option 2: Leveraging Opal
Opal introduces AI natively within the Optimizely ecosystem.
Rather than building infrastructure from scratch, Opal enables:
-
AI-assisted content creation
-
Campaign generation
-
Intelligent experimentation insights
-
Workflow-level automation
From a developer perspective, Opal reduces:
-
Integration complexity
-
Maintenance overhead
-
Governance concerns
It shifts AI from being API-driven to being workflow-native.
Architectural Decision: Opal vs Custom AI
In enterprise implementations, the decision should be strategic.
| Criteria | Opal | Custom Integration |
| Speed to Market | High | Medium |
| Full AI Control | Medium | High |
| Maintenance | Low | Higher |
| Compliance Control | Managed | Self-managed |
| Custom ML Use Cases | Limited | Strong |
Recommended Enterprise Approach
In most scenarios, I recommend a hybrid model:
-
Use Opal for editor productivity and campaign acceleration.
-
Use custom AI integration for domain-specific business logic.
-
Keep AI infrastructure modular and loosely coupled.
This ensures flexibility without overengineering.
Designing AI-Ready Content Models
Regardless of approach, structure matters.
Best practices:
-
Avoid storing critical data in large RichText blobs.
-
Use structured properties.
-
Maintain clean content types.
-
Align metadata fields for AI enrichment.
AI works best with well-structured data.
Final Thoughts:-
AI in Optimizely CMS should not be treated as a feature toggle.
It is an architectural layer.
As developers and architects, our responsibility is to:
-
Protect performance
-
Maintain security
-
Ensure maintainability
-
Deliver business value
Whether through custom services or via Opal, the goal remains the same:
Build intelligent, scalable digital experiences. :)
Comments