Content Flexibility vs Control: A Deep Dive into Optimizely Content Modeling
Choosing the Right Property Type for Better Editor Experience and Performance
When modeling content in Optimizely CMS, one of the most common design decisions developers face is choosing between ContentArea and IList<ContentReference>.
At first glance, both allow you to reference multiple content items. However, they serve very different purposes, impact editor experience, and influence long-term maintainability.
This article breaks down:
-
Key differences
-
Benefits and limitations
-
Best practices
-
When to use one over the other
Understanding the Two Approaches
ContentArea
ContentArea is a first-class CMS concept designed for flexible, editor-driven content composition.
It allows editors to:
-
Create blocks inline
-
Drag & drop blocks
-
Reorder content
-
Apply visitor groups
-
Mix different block types
IList<ContentReference>
IList<ContentReference> is a simple reference list that points to existing content items.
It is more structured and controlled, but offers fewer editor features.
Editor Experience Comparison
| Feature | ContentArea | IList<ContentReference> |
|---|---|---|
| Create new block | ✅ Yes | ❌ No |
| Drag & drop | ✅ Yes | ❌ No |
| Reorder items | ✅ Yes | ⚠️ Limited |
| Inline editing | ✅ Yes | ❌ No |
| Visitor groups | ✅ Yes | ❌ No |
| Mixed content types | ✅ Yes | ⚠️ Possible but limited |
| Structured control | ⚠️ Less | ✅ More |
Why “Create Block” Is Missing for IList<ContentReference>
Even with attributes like:
Optimizely will not show a “Create new block” button for IList<ContentReference>.
Why?
Because:
-
IList<ContentReference>is treated as a picker, not a container -
It assumes content already exists elsewhere
-
It does not support inline content creation by design
This is intentional and aligns with Optimizely’s content model philosophy.
When You SHOULD Use ContentArea
Use ContentArea when:
-
Editors need flexibility
-
Content structure may evolve
-
Blocks are page-specific
-
Inline creation improves productivity
-
Visitor group personalization is required
Typical use cases
-
Page body content
-
Landing page sections
-
Flexible navigation areas
-
Campaign-driven layouts
Best practice
This gives editors full control while keeping block types constrained.
When You SHOULD Use IList<ContentReference>
Use IList<ContentReference> when:
-
Content should be centrally managed
-
Editors must select from pre-approved items
-
Structure should remain consistent
-
You want to prevent content sprawl
Typical use cases
-
Global navigation links
-
Footer links
-
Legal or compliance-driven content
-
Shared CTA collections
-
Controlled taxonomies
This approach encourages reuse and governance.
Performance Considerations
| Aspect | ContentArea | IList<ContentReference> |
|---|---|---|
| Rendering | Slightly heavier | Lightweight |
| Flexibility | High | Low |
| Caching predictability | Medium | High |
| Bulk loading | Moderate | Easier |
For navigation and header/footer elements,
IList<ContentReference>is often preferred for predictability and performance.
Recommended Hybrid Pattern (Best of Both Worlds)
Many mature Optimizely solutions use both, intentionally:
-
ContentArea for page-level, flexible content
-
IList<ContentReference> for global, reusable elements
Example:
-
Header navigation →
IList<ContentReference> -
Mega menu content →
ContentArea
This balances editor freedom with architectural control.
Final Recommendation
Do not choose based on convenience — choose based on content ownership and editorial intent.
Quick decision guide:
-
Should editors freely compose content? → ContentArea
-
Should content be reusable and controlled? → IList<ContentReference>
Getting this decision right early prevents:
-
Editor frustration
-
Over-engineering
-
Content duplication
-
Long-term maintenance issues
Closing Thoughts
Content modeling is one of the most impactful architectural decisions in Optimizely CMS. Understanding the difference between ContentArea and IList<ContentReference> allows you to build solutions that are not only technically sound, but also editor-friendly and scalable.
Comments