Anders Hattestad
Dec 27, 2010
visibility 12681
star star star star star
(5 votes)

Multiplexing providers

Sometimes you want to use more than one security provider. And that's what the EPiServer multiplex provider can help us. You can add one or more providers in the MultiplexingMembershipProvider section and the same numbers of items in the MultiplexingRoleProvider for the roles.

 

But if one provider allows search for emails, and another doesn't it throws an error. Bit annoying, but is easy to fix. you can add your own multiplexing provider like this:(only added try catch from the underline code)

Code Snippet
  1. public class MultiplexingMembershipProvider : EPiServer.Security.MultiplexingMembershipProvider
  2. {
  3.     public override string GetUserNameByEmail(string email)
  4.     {
  5.         foreach (MembershipProvider provider in this.Providers)
  6.         {
  7.             try
  8.             {
  9.                 string userNameByEmail = provider.GetUserNameByEmail(email);
  10.                 if (userNameByEmail != null)
  11.                 {
  12.                     this.CurrentUsername = userNameByEmail;
  13.                     return userNameByEmail;
  14.                 }
  15.             }
  16.             catch { }
  17.         }
  18.         return null;
  19.     }
  20. }

But there are also times when you want to have 2 user providers and only one role provider. When you have made a page based user provider, and want them to share the same roles. Then its a bit hassle, since if you add 2 of the same role providers, all roles are duplicated.

<add name="MultiplexingRoleProvider" type="Itera.Security.MultiplexingRoleProvider, Itera.Security" 
     provider1="SqlServerRoleProvider" 
     provider2="WindowsRoleProvider" 
     provider3="SqlServerRoleProvider" 
     providerMap1="SqlServerMembershipProvider" 
     providerMap2="WindowsMembershipProvider"
     providerMap3="EPiServerMembershipProvider"/>

The trick is to create your own MultiplexingRoleProvider. At the first glance it is pretty straight forward, but there are stuff inside the AdminGroup page that detects if your role provider inherits form MultiplexingRoleProvider, and gets all the users from the Providers from the role provider. And that is not virtual and is not possible to override.image

image

So to have 2 user providers and only one role provider you have to make your own. And as most of the time you need to copy the code from reflector, and make your modifications.

My modification was that I created a DisitinctProvider list and replaced all references that needed to use that one instead of the Providers.

Code Snippet
  1. public IList<RoleProvider> Providers
  2. {
  3.     get
  4.     {
  5.         if (this._providers == null)
  6.         {
  7.             this.InitProviders();
  8.         }
  9.         return this._providers;
  10.     }
  11. }
  12.  
  13. public IList<RoleProvider> DistinctProviders
  14. {
  15.     get
  16.     {
  17.         if (this._distinctProviders == null)
  18.         {
  19.             this.InitProviders();
  20.         }
  21.         return this._distinctProviders;
  22.     }
  23. }

The only trouble then is that in the admin group page you don’t get provider behind the role

image

This is what i would like to call a mistake by the code team that created the AdminGroup page. They should have checked for an interface instead of hardcode in the MultiPlexRoleProvider. or at least made all the properties there virtual.

 

Itera.Security.MultiplexingMembershipProvider

and

Itera.Security.MultiplexingRoleProvider

is inside the zip file here.

Dec 27, 2010

Comments

Anders Hattestad
Anders Hattestad Jan 3, 2011 06:37 PM

Not my best blog, but rate it 1 was a bit harse:)

Anders Hattestad
Anders Hattestad Jan 20, 2011 10:12 AM

Wow, got 2 fives :) thx

Dennis Malmgren
Dennis Malmgren Mar 4, 2011 08:33 PM

We ran into this issue with one customer wanting to authenticate against double AD nodes. Unfortunately that was before this post so had to solve it haphazardly :) great 'fix' to the builtin functionality.

error Please login to comment.
Latest blogs
Finding Thomas Part 3 - The Moment of Recognition

Remember Thomas? In digital landscape, Thomas is the returning visitor who reads everything, opens every email, converts on nothing. In standard...

Ritu Madan | Jun 26, 2026

Add more scheduled job settings from the Optimizely CMS 12 admin UI -- with OptiScheduledJob.ExtraParameters

  Optimizely (EPiServer) CMS 12 ships a great scheduled-jobs framework, but it has one frustrating gap: a job has nowhere to store its own...

Binh Nguyen Thi | Jun 25, 2026

Automated Search & Navigation to Graph Migration with Claude Code

A Claude Code plugin that scans your S&N codebase, applies Graph SDK transformations, and validates the result. Install once, run one command. CMS ...

Connor Fortin | Jun 24, 2026

Migrating from Find to Graph: Lessons Learned from a Real CMS 13 Project

While migrating a search solution from Optimizely Search & Navigation (Find) to Optimizely Graph in CMS 13, I encountered several issues that were...

Binh Nguyen Thi | Jun 24, 2026

Optimizely: Upgrade Opti-ID and .NET 10 in CMS 12

Many Optimizely customers are planning their roadmap around a future migration to Optimizely CMS 13. As a result, upgrades such as Opti ID adoption...

Madhu | Jun 23, 2026 |

Understanding Optimizely Graph: Caching, Webhooks & Avoiding Stale Content (Optimizely SaaS CMS)

📌 Scope: This post covers Optimizely CMS (SaaS) only — using the official @optimizely/cms-sdk and @optimizely/cms-cli packages with Next.js 15. If...

Kiran Patil | Jun 23, 2026 |