Daniel Ovaska
Feb 25, 2021
  2899
(1 votes)

Security issue with multiple package sources

Scenario

You are using a private nuget feed for a single package v 1.0.0 and a public nuget feed for the rest of your packages. An attacker can then upload a new package to public nuget feed using the same name as your private package but with a higher bug fix version v 1.0.1. Unless you have thought about this scenario your build server will look across all package sources and pick the most updated version (the faked 1.0.1 version on the public feed). So if you are using a private package source you are still not safe unless that is the only source you are using for your packages.

Solution

More detailed information can be found here about this vulnerability (https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-24105) along with suggestions for how to mitigate the risks.

For high security scenarios:

  • Use one feed. If you have a private feed with internal packages, make that the only feed and add secure handling of public packages to that feed if you need. All projects should then use that one safe feed.
    https://azure.microsoft.com/sv-se/services/devops/artifacts/ is a good option that can deliver that if you don't want to create your own.

Additional mitigation:

  • Lock down your versions and make sure your build server can't update minor version automatically.
    Both npm and nuget can generate such a lock file easily that can then be used to force build server to use a specific version of all dependencies. Use nuget restore --lockedmode on CI servers to use the lock file.
  • Make sure one package can only be downloaded from one source.
    Use scope and npmrc file for npm to specify source per package. Use id prefix for nuget packages to block private packages from being uploaded to public feeds.

This is not an Episerver specific vulnerability but good to be aware of if security is important for your site.

I've added it to my security checklist for Episerver solutions, If you haven't gone through that for your site, I would suggest starting at the top and work your way down until you reach a decent level for your security requirements. 

Stay safe, don't get hacked! Happy coding!

Feb 25, 2021

Comments

Please login to comment.
Latest blogs
AEO/GEO: A practical guide

Search changed. People ask AI tools. AI answers. Your content must be understandable, citable, and accessible to both humans and machines. That’s...

Naveed Ul-Haq | Feb 17, 2026 |

We Cloned Our Best Analyst with AI: How Our Opal Hackathon Grand Prize Winner is Changing Experimentation

Every experimentation team knows the feeling. You have a backlog of experiment ideas, but progress is bottlenecked by one critical team member, the...

Polly Walton | Feb 16, 2026

Architecting AI in Optimizely CMS: When to Use Opal vs Custom Integration

AI is rapidly becoming a core capability in modern digital experience platforms. As developers working with Optimizely CMS 12 (.NET Core), the real...

Keshav Dave | Feb 15, 2026

Reducing Web Experimentation MAU Using the REST API

Overview Optimizely Web Experimentation counts an MAU based upon the script snippet rendering for evauluation of web experiement. Therefore when yo...

Scott Reed | Feb 13, 2026