Daniel Ovaska
Feb 25, 2021
  2958
(1 votes)

Security issue with multiple package sources

Scenario

You are using a private nuget feed for a single package v 1.0.0 and a public nuget feed for the rest of your packages. An attacker can then upload a new package to public nuget feed using the same name as your private package but with a higher bug fix version v 1.0.1. Unless you have thought about this scenario your build server will look across all package sources and pick the most updated version (the faked 1.0.1 version on the public feed). So if you are using a private package source you are still not safe unless that is the only source you are using for your packages.

Solution

More detailed information can be found here about this vulnerability (https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2021-24105) along with suggestions for how to mitigate the risks.

For high security scenarios:

  • Use one feed. If you have a private feed with internal packages, make that the only feed and add secure handling of public packages to that feed if you need. All projects should then use that one safe feed.
    https://azure.microsoft.com/sv-se/services/devops/artifacts/ is a good option that can deliver that if you don't want to create your own.

Additional mitigation:

  • Lock down your versions and make sure your build server can't update minor version automatically.
    Both npm and nuget can generate such a lock file easily that can then be used to force build server to use a specific version of all dependencies. Use nuget restore --lockedmode on CI servers to use the lock file.
  • Make sure one package can only be downloaded from one source.
    Use scope and npmrc file for npm to specify source per package. Use id prefix for nuget packages to block private packages from being uploaded to public feeds.

This is not an Episerver specific vulnerability but good to be aware of if security is important for your site.

I've added it to my security checklist for Episerver solutions, If you haven't gone through that for your site, I would suggest starting at the top and work your way down until you reach a decent level for your security requirements. 

Stay safe, don't get hacked! Happy coding!

Feb 25, 2021

Comments

Please login to comment.
Latest blogs
Searchable settings page

In my current project which has been actively developed for quite some time we have a big classic settings page. Unfortunately the placement and...

Per Nergård (MVP) | Apr 6, 2026

Using Azure Devops Pipelines in Optimizely SAAS (Configured) Commerce

Introduction When working with SAAS Commerce build service v2 your currently need to use a github repo with configured branches to start deployment...

Mark Hall | Apr 4, 2026 |

Forcing Lowercase URLs in Optimizely CMS During Auto-Translation

Learn how to fix uppercase and punctuation issues in Optimizely CMS 12 URL segments caused by LanguageManager auto-translation using a custom...

Stuart | Apr 2, 2026 |

Stott Robots Handler v7 for Optimizely CMS 13

Stott Robots Handler version 7 is now available for  Optimizely PaaS CMS 13 . This is includes updates to support the switch from a Site based...

Mark Stott | Apr 2, 2026