A critical vulnerability was discovered in React Server Components (Next.js). Our systems remain protected but we advise to update packages to newest version. Learn More

Henrik Fransas
Sep 9, 2014
  4819
(0 votes)

How to solve “Missing configuration section: episerver” error

A couple of times I have gotten this message when updating the nuget-package from EPiServer. The problem is that one of the nuget packages has an error in it’s web.config transformation that puts the assembly-dependency back to an old version of EPiServer.Configuration.

If you see this error, check your configuration file (web.config) and search for this row:

<assemblyIdentity name="EPiServer.Configuration" publicKeyToken="8fe83dea738b45b7" culture="neutral" />

Check what version it says, for me after last upgrade it said:

<dependentAssembly>
  <assemblyIdentity name="EPiServer.Configuration" publicKeyToken="8fe83dea738b45b7" culture="neutral" />
  <bindingRedirect oldVersion="0.0.0.0-7.5.394.2" newVersion="7.5.394.2" />
</dependentAssembly>

That is a very old version, and after manually changing to the version I updated to (rightclick and select property on the EpiServer.Configuration – dll file below the package EPiServer CMS Core) I got it to work

dependentAssembly>
  <assemblyIdentity name="EPiServer.Configuration" publicKeyToken="8fe83dea738b45b7" culture="neutral" />
  <bindingRedirect oldVersion="0.0.0.0-7.13.3.0" newVersion="7.13.3.0" />
</dependentAssembly>

I will report it to EPiServer as a bug

Sep 09, 2014

Comments

Sep 10, 2014 09:26 AM

I cant see that we have changed anything regarding this. What we do is that we have a install.ps1 that is called during install. It will iterate over all files in the lib folder for that specific nuget package and add binding redirects for them. Clearly 7.5.394.2 version is not there....
My guess is for some reason is GAC installed assemblies involved, perhaps by Visual Studio??
But please report a bug, and then we can try to investigate more around this. Please add as much information as possible in the bug, that can be very useful during investigation.

Henrik Fransas
Henrik Fransas Sep 11, 2014 08:04 AM

I will do that Johan, I think it was in the order i installed it, but I will try to reproduce it on a alloy-site

Please login to comment.
Latest blogs
Looking back at Optimizely in 2025

Explore Optimizely's architectural shift in 2025, which removed coordination cost through a unified execution loop. Learn how agentic Opal AI and...

Andy Blyth | Dec 17, 2025 |

Cleaning Up Content Graph Webhooks in PaaS CMS: Scheduled Job

The Problem Bit of a niche issue, but we are building a headless solution where the presentation layer is hosted on Netlify, when in a regular...

Minesh Shah (Netcel) | Dec 17, 2025

A day in the life of an Optimizely OMVP - OptiGraphExtensions v2.0: Enhanced Search Control with Language Support and Synonym Slots

Supercharge your Optimizely Graph search experience with powerful new features for multilingual sites and fine-grained search tuning. As search...

Graham Carr | Dec 16, 2025

A day in the life of an Optimizely OMVP - Optimizely Opal: Specialized Agents, Workflows, and Tools Explained

The AI landscape in digital experience platforms has shifted dramatically. At Opticon 2025, Optimizely unveiled the next evolution of Optimizely Op...

Graham Carr | Dec 16, 2025

Optimizely CMS - Learning by Doing: EP09 - Create Hero, Breadcrumb's and Integrate SEO : Demo

  Episode 9  is Live!! The latest installment of my  Learning by Doing: Build Series  on  Optimizely Episode 9 CMS 12  is now available on YouTube!...

Ratish | Dec 15, 2025 |

Building simple Opal tools for product search and content creation

Optimizely Opal tools make it easy for AI agents to call your APIs – in this post we’ll build a small ASP.NET host that exposes two of them: one fo...

Pär Wissmark | Dec 13, 2025 |