A critical vulnerability was discovered in React Server Components (Next.js). Our systems remain protected but we advise to update packages to newest version. Learn More

Johan Björnfot
Feb 3, 2011
  5114
(2 votes)

Criterion implementation patterns

To implement a criterion to be used with the personalization concept introduced in CMS6R2 is pretty straightforward. There are however some guidelines to be aware of:

  • If you implement ICriterion.Subscribe and in the method set up an event handler for any event then you should implement ICriterion.Unsubscribe as well and in that implementation remove all event handlers that where setup in Subscribe.

The reason for this is to avoid getting “dangling” event handlers which cause both unwanted behavior (in meaning event handlers for unused/old criterions are still called) and “memory leakage” (old criteria instances cannot be garbage collected since they are rooted through the event handler).

The pattern for Subscribe/Unsubscribe is that Subscribe on each used criterion instance is not only called during initialization but also whenever a VisitorGroup containing the criterion is saved. During Save of a VisitorGroup the framework will first call Unsubscribe for all previous existing criteria's on that group. Then new criteria instances will be created for the group and Subscribe will be called on these instances.

 

  • Remember that IsMatch can be called several time during a request.

An obvious consequence of this is that the execution time for the call to IsMatch will affect the time for the web request. You should also avoid taking locks (or at least keep the scope to a minimum) inside the method since that would prevent requests from running in parallel.

If your criteria is dependent on some external resource (for example an external database) then you should take the scenario where the external resource is not accessible into consideration.

The purpose of this post is of course not to scare you from writing your own criteria's (that is something we encourage you to do) but to give you a guideline to successful criterion implementations! :-)

Feb 03, 2011

Comments

Please login to comment.
Latest blogs
Looking back at Optimizely in 2025

Explore Optimizely's architectural shift in 2025, which removed coordination cost through a unified execution loop. Learn how agentic Opal AI and...

Andy Blyth | Dec 17, 2025 |

Cleaning Up Content Graph Webhooks in PaaS CMS: Scheduled Job

The Problem Bit of a niche issue, but we are building a headless solution where the presentation layer is hosted on Netlify, when in a regular...

Minesh Shah (Netcel) | Dec 17, 2025

A day in the life of an Optimizely OMVP - OptiGraphExtensions v2.0: Enhanced Search Control with Language Support and Synonym Slots

Supercharge your Optimizely Graph search experience with powerful new features for multilingual sites and fine-grained search tuning. As search...

Graham Carr | Dec 16, 2025

A day in the life of an Optimizely OMVP - Optimizely Opal: Specialized Agents, Workflows, and Tools Explained

The AI landscape in digital experience platforms has shifted dramatically. At Opticon 2025, Optimizely unveiled the next evolution of Optimizely Op...

Graham Carr | Dec 16, 2025