A critical vulnerability was discovered in React Server Components (Next.js). Our Systems Remain Fully Protected. Learn More

Per Nergård (MVP)
Dec 23, 2010
  4047
(0 votes)

Custom properties doesn’t inherit base types settings class

Today I was playing around with custom properties and made my own version of the PropertyXhtmlString.

I wanted to disable some of the editor options so I clicked the “Custom Settings” tab for my custom property but to my surprise there wasn’t any settings available.

So it seems that if you do custom properties they don’t inherit the base type settings class.

It’s easy to fix though. In my case using the TinyMCE editor I had to add the following attribute to my custom property control class: [PropertySettings(typeof(TinyMCESettings), true)].

Dec 23, 2010

Comments

Please login to comment.
Latest blogs
Jhoose Security Modules v2.6.0 — Added support for Permissions Policy and .NET 10

Version 2.6.0 adds Permissions Policy header support, updates to .NET 10, improved policy management, configurable security settings, and enhanced...

Andrew Markham | Dec 6, 2025 |

Building a 360° Customer Profile With AI: How Opal + Optimizely Unlock Predictive Personalization

Creating truly relevant customer experiences requires more than collecting data—it requires understanding it. Most organizations already have rich...

Sujit Senapati | Dec 4, 2025

Building a Lightweight Optimizely SaaS CMS Solution with 11ty

Modern web development often requires striking a difficult balance between site performance and the flexibility needed by content editors. To addre...

Minesh Shah (Netcel) | Dec 3, 2025

Creating Opal Tools Using The C# SDK

Over the last few months, my colleagues at Netcel and I have partaken in two different challenge events organised by Optimizely and centered around...

Mark Stott | Dec 3, 2025