Stephan Lonntorp
Nov 22, 2018
visibility 3461
star star star star star
(2 votes)

Localizations in PropertyValueList

The PropertyValueList property type ca be really useful for things that don't have a need for reuse, or doesn't have a view. If you've used it you might have noticed that the editor experience, especially in regards to localizations, hasn't been optimal.

In Per's blog post from 2015, the question on how to localize arose, and Kai de Leuw answered with:

[Display(Name="/path/to/lang/resource")]

That worked really well, up until a few weeks ago.

In Episerver CMS UI 11.12, something was introduced, that broke this functionality. But have no fear, it can still be done, and it's even cleaner.

Now, your POCOs are localized in the same way that other content types are localized.

Provided you have a POCO like this:

public class Contact {
    public string Name { get; set; }
    public string Country { get; set; }
}

You can localize it with an XML like this:

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<languages>
  <language name="English" id="en">
    <contenttypes>
      <Contact>
        <properties>
          <Name>
            <caption>Contact name</caption>
            <help>The name of the contact.</help>
          </Name>
          <Country>
            <caption>Country of origin</caption>
            <help>The country of origin for the contact.</help>
          </Country>
        </properties>
      </Contact>
    </contenttypes>
  </language>
</languages>

Happy localizing!

Nov 22, 2018

Comments

valdis
valdis Nov 23, 2018 06:55 AM

hmm.. think I should really dig into this built-in localization thingy and try to remove xpath based things there as well ;)

Stephan Lonntorp
Stephan Lonntorp Nov 23, 2018 08:09 AM

@valdis Totally off-topic, but why? The XML based localization stuff (or your DbLocalizationProvider for that matter) should, in my opinion, only be used for translation of the Episerver UI. Everything else is content, and should be managed as such.

Treating UI texts as content enables editors to do A/B testing, scheduling and anything else that the CMS allows. While your DbLocalizationProvider certainly solves the editability challenge that the XML-based system has, and is a fine piece of engineering, in my opinion it solves a problem that shouldn't be a problem.

valdis
valdis Nov 26, 2018 02:15 PM

because you would not have these stringly-typed problems ;)

error Please login to comment.
Latest blogs
Composition Over Inheritance: Why Your Content Contract Is Not a Base Class

Inside the structural conformance pattern in SaaS CMS — from server-side inheritance to pipeline governance. A contract in Optimizely SaaS CMS is...

Vipin Banka | Sep 19, 2026

Optimizely Opti ID Integration: Why the API Key Was Missing from the DXP Management Portal

While working on an Optimizely CMS 12 Opti ID integration recently, we ran into an issue that initially appeared to be related to SSO authenticatio...

Madhu | Sep 18, 2026 |

Extending a Contract: What You Can Override

Contracts share fields across content types — but not every field setting can be overridden. Push the same contract onto several components, and CM...

Chirag Khanna | Sep 18, 2026 |

Building a Blazor Server UI Inside the Optimizely CMS 13 Admin Shell

What I learned shipping a Blazor Server UI inside Optimizely CMS 13 — Razor components in a NuGet package, the Blazor hub next to MapContent(),...

Stanisław Szołkowski | Sep 17, 2026 |