Anders Hattestad
Jan 12, 2011
visibility 7453
star star star star star
(4 votes)

Dynamic Data Store and new properties on Types

When you use access the data store you get your object with the properties from the first time you created the store. If you have added properties on thje type the definition in the store is not updated, and your object will be missing values from the new properties.

That's a bit hassle, since I guess most of you will add new properties after the first time the store is created.

So instead of accessing the store like this

Code Snippet
  1. public static DynamicDataStore Store
  2. {
  3.     get
  4.     {
  5.         return DynamicDataStoreFactory.Instance.GetStore(typeof(ProductItem)) ??
  6.                DynamicDataStoreFactory.Instance.CreateStore(typeof(ProductItem));
  7.     }
  8. }
I have created myself and extension method so
Code Snippet
  1. public static DynamicDataStore Store
  2. {
  3.     get
  4.     {
  5.         return DynamicDataStoreFactory.Instance.GetCreateEnsureStore(typeof(ProductItem));
  6.     }
  7. }

Where the actually code is like this.

Code Snippet
  1. using System;
  2. using System.Collections.Generic;
  3. using System.Linq;
  4. using System.Web;
  5.  
  6. namespace EPiServer.Data.Dynamic
  7. {
  8.     public static class StoreExtensions
  9.     {
  10.         static object lockObject = new object();
  11.         static Dictionary<Type, bool> done = new Dictionary<Type, bool>();
  12.         public static DynamicDataStore GetCreateEnsureStore(this DynamicDataStoreFactory factory,Type type)
  13.         {
  14.             bool isFirstTime = true;
  15.             lock (lockObject)
  16.                 if (!done.TryGetValue(type, out isFirstTime))
  17.                     isFirstTime = true;
  18.             if (isFirstTime)
  19.             {
  20.                 var result= factory.GetStore(type);
  21.                 if (result == null)
  22.                     result = factory.CreateStore(type);
  23.                 else
  24.                 {
  25.                     var def = result.StoreDefinition;
  26.                     def.Remap(type);
  27.                     def.CommitChanges();
  28.                 }
  29.                 lock (lockObject)
  30.                 {
  31.                     done[type] = false;
  32.                 }
  33.                 
  34.             }
  35.             return factory.GetStore(type);
  36.         }
  37.  
  38.     }
  39. }

This code will on the first time it get accessed, checks if the store exits, and if not creates it. And if it exists, it will be remap to the type before it returns the store.

Jan 12, 2011

Comments

Erik Nordin Wahlberg
Erik Nordin Wahlberg Jan 12, 2011 09:25 PM

Nice one, was wondering how to solve this the other day. :)

Anders Hattestad
Anders Hattestad Jan 12, 2011 10:51 PM

My previous method was to delete the store and create a new one...
So it’s a big improvement :)

Jan 13, 2011 09:19 AM

Interesting code, but I can't figure out why you use the lockObject? Is it only to make it thread safe or what is its purpose?

Anders Hattestad
Anders Hattestad Jan 13, 2011 10:20 AM

Just to make it thread safe,
I thought that could be a good idea, but I quess most of the times this isn't a problem.
I lock when I do a read, but are not sure if that's necessery. Did google it, and was some contradiction statements about it

smithsson68@gmail.com
smithsson68@gmail.com Jan 13, 2011 03:29 PM

You can also check if the store actually needs remapping like this:

var def = result.StoreDefinition;
if (!def.ValidateAgainstMappings(typeof(type), false))
{
def.ReMap(typeof(type));
def.CommitChanges();
}

Anders Hattestad
Anders Hattestad Jan 13, 2011 05:39 PM

That was a good tip. It felt wrong to always remap the store, but I didn't bother to look further.

Anders Hattestad
Anders Hattestad Jan 13, 2011 06:00 PM

Have added Mr Smith's code and uploaded it here
http://world.episerver.com/Code/Anders-Hattestad1/GetCreateEnsureStore/

Joshua Folkerts
Joshua Folkerts Jan 31, 2011 02:43 PM

Very nice. I was trying to do this, this weekend. Thanks for the generosity.

error Please login to comment.
Latest blogs
Finding Thomas Part 3 - The Moment of Recognition

Remember Thomas? In digital landscape, Thomas is the returning visitor who reads everything, opens every email, converts on nothing. In standard...

Ritu Madan | Jun 26, 2026

Add more scheduled job settings from the Optimizely CMS 12 admin UI -- with OptiScheduledJob.ExtraParameters

  Optimizely (EPiServer) CMS 12 ships a great scheduled-jobs framework, but it has one frustrating gap: a job has nowhere to store its own...

Binh Nguyen Thi | Jun 25, 2026

Automated Search & Navigation to Graph Migration with Claude Code

A Claude Code plugin that scans your S&N codebase, applies Graph SDK transformations, and validates the result. Install once, run one command. CMS ...

Connor Fortin | Jun 24, 2026

Migrating from Find to Graph: Lessons Learned from a Real CMS 13 Project

While migrating a search solution from Optimizely Search & Navigation (Find) to Optimizely Graph in CMS 13, I encountered several issues that were...

Binh Nguyen Thi | Jun 24, 2026

Optimizely: Upgrade Opti-ID and .NET 10 in CMS 12

Many Optimizely customers are planning their roadmap around a future migration to Optimizely CMS 13. As a result, upgrades such as Opti ID adoption...

Madhu | Jun 23, 2026 |

Understanding Optimizely Graph: Caching, Webhooks & Avoiding Stale Content (Optimizely SaaS CMS)

📌 Scope: This post covers Optimizely CMS (SaaS) only — using the official @optimizely/cms-sdk and @optimizely/cms-cli packages with Next.js 15. If...

Kiran Patil | Jun 23, 2026 |