Stellan Danald
Dec 6, 2016
  7303
(3 votes)

Episerver Find - Conditional Sorting?

A client asked me if it was possible to push a specific variation to the top of a list that is coming from Find. I immediately replied "Of course!", since like most things working with development, almost everything is possible; It's just a matter of time/effort, and I thought it would be a quick change.

When I first looked into the task, I noticed that the list was set to order by the variations SortOrder and not score, so boosting wasn't really an option.

SearchClient.Instance.Search<VariationContent>()
	.Filter(x => x.Parents.Match(refId.ToString()))
	…… // Other visibility conditions, facets/terms/skip/take etc
	.OrderBy(x => x.SortOrder)
	.GetResult();


My next step was to see if there are any possibilities do to a conditional sort, as in sorting with filters, or perhaps using custom script sorting which you can do with Elasticsearch that Episerver Find is based upon. After a lot of googling and plowing through a lot of interesting blog posts and questions on world.episerver.com, I couldn't find anything that was related to my task.


Next step was to do some reflection of the Episerver.Find assembly. What I found there was that it IS possible, IF you were sorting by nested objects, using the following method in the Episerver.Find.NestedSortingExtensions class

.OrderBy(enumerableFieldSelector, itemFieldSelector, filterExpression)

Unfortunately, there aren't any existing methods that does what I was looking for, e.g.

.OrderBy(fieldSelector, filterExpression)


Taking another look at the Find SDK, I stumbled upon .Include(filterExpression, boostMultiplier), which, together with the extension .ThenByScore(), written by Henrik Lindström, that we already use, would help me with my task.

.Include(filterExpression, boostMultiplier) allowes me to:

  1. Search for my specific item, using the regular .For(query) with the .InField(fieldSelector) and .Filter(filterExpression)
  2. Get the rest of the variations with the same boosting score (since they don't get a hit in the .For), that I can then order using the field SortOrder, just like before.

The final solution was

SearchClient.Instance.Search<VariationContent>()
	.For(itemId)
	.InField(x => x.ItemId)
	.Filter(x => x.Parents.Match(refId.ToString()))
	.Include(x => x.Parents.Match(refId.ToString()), 1)
	…… // Other visibility conditions, facets/terms/skip/take etc
	.OrderByScore()
	.ThenBy(x => x.SortOrder)
	.GetResult();


I'm sure there are multiple ways to achieve the same results, but this was the simplest way I could do it and it might help someone else.

Cheers! /
Stellan Danald,
Solutions Architect @ Nansen

Dec 06, 2016

Comments

Marcin Samojłowicz
Marcin Samojłowicz Jan 19, 2018 04:47 PM

Thanks Stellan You saved me fiew houers of work :) 

Please login to comment.
Latest blogs
Optimizely CMS 13 and the Alloy demo site

The Alloy demo site now runs on Optimizely CMS 13. Here’s a quick guide to getting it up and running locally.

Tomas Hensrud Gulla | Apr 10, 2026 |

A day in the life of an Optimizely OMVP: Getting Up to Speed with Optimizely CMS 13 — A Free Learning Path

If you're working with Optimizely and haven't started exploring CMS 13 yet, now's the time. I've put together a dedicated CMS 13 course within the...

Graham Carr | Apr 10, 2026

A day in the life of an Optimizely OMVP: Optimizely CMS 13 Is Here: The Features, The Add-Ons, and What's Coming Next

CMS 13 went GA on 31st March 2026, and after months of previews, webinars, and internal engineering sessions, it's finally real. I've been deep in...

Graham Carr | Apr 10, 2026

How to get the Page Tree back in Optimizely CMS

Lost the page tree in Optimizely CMS? Here's why it happens and the non-obvious fix to get it back.

Henning Sjørbotten | Apr 10, 2026 |