Try our conversational search powered by Generative AI!

Episerver forms - AA compliance

Vote:
 

Hi All,

Quick question for the Epi wizards.

Are Epi forms accessible? If not, is it easy enough to make them level AA compliant (client requires level AA WCAG compliance)?

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks!

AG

#174067
Jan 17, 2017 17:40
Vote:
 

I do not know it by default those are AA compliant but you can customize HTML of form elements as you wish.

We have a project where we changed all form elements.

You can take existing views as an example from "modules/_protected/EPiServer.Forms/Views/EPiServer.Forms.zip" file. Extract those views and take as an example. You can also convert those to Razor views if you want (we did it in our project).

Then you can put your modified ones into "/Views/Shared/ElementBlocks" folder but it is also possible to configure your own path by customizing view engine.

#174079
Jan 18, 2017 8:34
Vote:
 

Hi, we will invest more to be AA compliant, please give us feedback or share us what you did, intend to do, ...

As Maris said, you can fully customize all view templates.

You don't need to customize the View Engine to point to your new templates.

#174135
Edited, Jan 19, 2017 12:29
Vote:
 

Hi,

Episerver Forms is a much better tool for making forms than xForms, but stille there is a way to go to make the forms user friendly and accessible. The most pressing issue to fullfill WCAG 2.0 AA in my ophinion, is the captcha. The captcha is difficult to use, even for people without any disabilities, because the letters in the photo is difficult to read/see. There is no way to submit a form with captcha for blind users, so therefore it should not be used. If one should feel the need for captcha, reCAPTCHA from Google is a much better choice (like the one beeing used on this site :)). 

When applying checkbox and radiobuttons in Episerver Forms, you do not get a fieldset enclosing the elements, and the heading is a <span>, instead of a <legend>.

For usability and accessibility reasons, I miss the HTML5 attributes, like required and beeing able to set types on input.

#174143
Edited, Jan 19, 2017 13:31
Vote:
 

Hi Aud Marie,

I create story AFORM-937 to improve Forms template, to fulfill WCAG 2.0 AA.

 - Captcha (you can use reCaptcha element, which is in Forms.Samples package)

 - fieldset, legend

 - required attribute might be OK.

 - type of input is not really easy.

The last two points might be harder to implement, because required or type of input is up to the Element (it can be custom Element we can't control) and up to the Validator apply to the Element (and it can be custom Validator as well). But we will try our best.

Any feedback about improving AA is always welcome here. Thank you.

#174170
Edited, Jan 20, 2017 10:44
Vote:
 

I create story AFORM-937 to improve Forms template, to fulfill WCAG 2.0 AA.

Could you update us on the progress of this 937 ticket? Or is this publicly accessible somewhere?

#191254
Apr 24, 2018 17:09
Vote:
 

Hi, sorry to say that story AFORM-937 does not have really high priority. I'll try to arrange it in May.

#191672
Apr 26, 2018 11:08
Vote:
 

What's the status here? I can't find AFORM-937 listed in the bug list.

#198593
Oct 31, 2018 14:40
Vote:
 

It does not have high enough priority yet. I (DevTeam) will talk with ProductOwner one more time to see any reconsideration.

#198609
Nov 01, 2018 3:27
Vote:
 

FYI: AFORM-2469, released as part of today's Find packages, addresses WCAG 2.0 level AA compliance issues.

#220740
Apr 03, 2020 17:33
Vote:
 

...and today, AFORM-2497 was released. This story is similar to AFORM-2469 but for dynamic content.

#221525
Apr 20, 2020 16:16
* You are NOT allowed to include any hyperlinks in the post because your account hasn't associated to your company. User profile should be updated.